University of Ghana Probes Heated On-Air Clash Between 2 Senior Academics

The University of Ghana has initiated internal disciplinary processes following a widely circulated video showing two of its senior academics engaged in a heated on-air confrontation. The exchange, which occurred during a panel discussion on TV3’s current affairs programme The Key Points on Saturday, 15 November 2025, involved Professor Ransford Gyampo and Dr George Domfeh.

The viral footage captured what began as a routine policy debate but quickly escalated into a tense, personal dispute between the two respected Senior Members of the University. The clash has since triggered widespread public commentary, with many questioning the conduct expected of academics representing a leading institution.

In a statement issued by Management on Thursday, 21 November 2025, the University noted that the incident fell short of the high standards of professionalism and decorum required of faculty and staff. The University emphasised that the incident not only undermined the dignity of the individuals involved but also risked eroding public confidence in the institution.

According to the statement, the University’s leadership invoked the Statutes of the University of Ghana (2024) and the Code of Conduct for Academic Senior Members (2011) to review the behaviour of the two academics. Management has begun formal internal processes aimed at assessing the altercation and determining appropriate disciplinary actions where necessary.

The University reiterated its unwavering commitment to maintaining integrity, professionalism and mutual respect among members of its academic community. It further reminded staff that they represent the institution in both public and private engagements and must therefore uphold its values at all times.

“Management remains committed to safeguarding the dignity of the University and preserving public confidence in the institution,” the statement stressed.

The development has sparked conversations within academic circles over how universities should manage public representation, particularly in an era where media appearances by scholars often intersect with highly polarised national debates. While some observers have described the clash as regrettable, others note it highlights the growing tension academics face when navigating contentious public discourse.

The outcome of the University’s internal review is expected to set an important precedent on conduct and accountability for senior academics engaged in media commentary.