Kevin Taylor Faces GH¢2.95m Defamation Judgment Debt

Ghanaian-American social commentator Kevin Ekow Baidoo Taylor is facing intensified legal pressure following a GH¢2.95 million defamation judgment awarded against him by the Accra High Court.

Aug 5, 2025 - 18:30
Aug 5, 2025 - 18:30
 0
Kevin Taylor Faces GH¢2.95m Defamation Judgment Debt
Kevin Taylor Faces GH¢2.95m Defamation Judgment Debt

Outspoken Ghanaian-American social commentator Kevin Ekow Baidoo Taylor is facing intensified legal pressure following a GH¢2.95 million defamation judgment awarded against him by the Accra High Court. The case, initiated by prominent legal practitioner Ace Kojo Anan Ankomah, stems from a series of public statements Taylor made that the court deemed defamatory.

The legal dispute dates back to 2020, when Ace Ankomah sued Kevin Taylor for making damaging allegations against him on social media platforms. After a lengthy trial, the court ruled in favor of Ankomah, awarding GH¢2.95 million in damages for reputational harm.

Despite the judgment, enforcement efforts stalled—until now.

Ato Forson Granted A Time Space Of One Week To File Witness Statements ...

Recent reports indicate that Ankomah has secured permission from the court to serve Taylor with the judgment and penal notice via substituted service. This means the notice will be published in a half-page graphic advertisement, a move aimed at overcoming difficulties in reaching Taylor directly.

Legal analysts suggest this step signals Ankomah’s intent to pursue full enforcement, potentially including asset seizure or garnishment if Taylor fails to comply.

Kevin Taylor Dragged To Court, Slapped With GH¢20 Million Defamation ...

The case has reignited debate over the boundaries of free speech and responsible journalism in Ghana’s digital media space. While Taylor’s supporters argue that he represents a voice for the voiceless, critics contend that unchecked commentary can cause serious reputational and legal harm.

Ace Ankomah, known for his advocacy on legal reform and civic responsibility, has maintained that the lawsuit was necessary to protect his integrity and deter reckless public discourse.

With substituted service approved, the countdown begins for Taylor to respond or face enforcement proceedings. The case could set a precedent for how Ghana’s courts handle defamation in the digital age—especially involving diaspora-based commentators.