Nii Armah Amarteifio Apologizes to Dr. Anne Daly Over Defamatory Claims
Nii Armah Amarteifio issues a public apology to U.S.-based Dr. Anne Sansa Daly after facing backlash and possible legal action over false certification claims. Read the full details of the retraction and public response.
Ghanaian media personality Nii Armah Amarteifio has issued a formal apology to U.S.-based medical practitioner Dr. Anne Sansa Daly, following a controversial publication questioning her medical credentials.
The apology, posted on Amarteifio’s verified Facebook page on Saturday, 24th May 2025, comes amid growing public criticism and the threat of legal action. The incident gained traction after Loud Silence Media’s Kevin Taylor dissected the issue during his program on Friday, 23rd May 2025, highlighting a legal rejoinder issued by Dr. Daly’s attorney.
Background: From Accusation to Retraction
The controversy stemmed from a letter Amarteifio claimed to have sent to the Medical and Dental Council (MDC) of Ghana, seeking clarification on whether Dr. Daly was licensed to practice in the country. While he insisted the inquiry was in the public interest and not driven by malice, a subsequent leak of the MDC’s response—which raised concerns about her certification status—ignited a wave of damaging narratives across blogs and social media.
Despite not personally releasing the MDC letter to the public, Amarteifio has now acknowledged that the situation negatively impacted Dr. Daly's reputation.
Also Read: President Mahama Revokes Anne Sansa Daly's Appointment to NHIA Board
“I acknowledge the significant emotional and reputational toll this incident has had, and I am truly sorry for the distress it has caused,” he stated.
He also confirmed that he had reached out to Dr. Daly directly to offer an unqualified apology for sharing the letter without her knowledge or consent.
Legal Action May Be Reconsidered
Dr. Daly’s legal team had reportedly been preparing a defamation lawsuit, but sources close to her indicate the apology might influence their next steps. Whether or not the legal proceedings move forward could depend on the perceived sincerity of Amarteifio’s remorse and his actions to publicly correct the misinformation.
Public Reaction: Mixed but Watchful
The public response has been divided. Some observers have praised Amarteifio’s decision to take responsibility, viewing it as a necessary act of integrity. Others, however, remain skeptical, suggesting the apology was more of a strategic move to avoid litigation rather than a genuine show of accountability.
“It’s good he apologized, but the damage was already done,” one commentator noted on social media.
What’s Next?
While Amarteifio’s retraction and apology may cool tensions in the short term, the long-term impact on his credibility and Dr. Daly’s reputation remains to be seen. The case underscores the importance of responsible journalism, especially when personal and professional reputations are at stake.
This incident also serves as a cautionary tale in Ghana’s digital media space, where unchecked claims and viral content can lead to real-world consequences—including emotional distress, legal battles, and loss of public trust.
